Prediction of Mika Lipp [] vs Corentin Denolly [272nd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W L W W L
Form
L W W W L W L L W LHead-To-Head: Lipp 1 - 0 Denolly
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lipp winning 2 and Denolly winning 0. The last match between Lipp and Denolly was at the M15 Trier, 22-08-2024, Second, Clay with Mika Lipp getting the victory 7-6(5) 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mika Lipp | 1 |
| Corentin Denolly | 0 |
| Lipp | Stats | Denolly |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (7-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 45% (10-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | 272 |
| Highest Rank | 269 | |
| 21 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | L |
| 0 | Titles | 12 |
| 53% (52-46) | Career Total W/L | 63% (412-244) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $56,935 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 7-5 |
Stats 
Mika Lipp
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 11 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:1:0 | Average Match Time | 2:1:0 |
| 63% (49/78) | 1st Serve % | 56% (46/82) |
| 67% (33/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (29/46) |
| 45% (13/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (16/36) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 45% (37/82) | Return Points Win % | 41% (32/78) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mika Lipp vs Corentin Denolly Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lipp 1 - 0 Denolly
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lipp has won 35.9% of points on their second serve, while Denolly has won 44.56%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lipp, in recent form, has won 50% of their opponent's second serve points, while Denolly has won 46.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.54% and 25.36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lipp has saved 40% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Denolly has saved 50.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lipp has won 56.1% of matches played (W/L 23/ 18), with Denolly winning 65.33% (W/L 49/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lipp has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 44/ 38), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Denolly has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 293/ 149), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 53/ 43).
- Player level: In the last year, Lipp has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.1% of matches (W/L 23/ 18), where as Denolly has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 82.05% of matches (W/L 32/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lipp winning 1 times and Denolly being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lipp winning 2 and Denolly winning 0. The last match between Lipp and Denolly was at the M15 Trier, 22-08-2024, Second, Clay with Mika Lipp getting the victory 7-6(5) 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:1:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lipp and Denolly have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lipp winning 0 times and Denolly 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Lipp winning 1, and Denolly 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lipp has played against opponents with an average rank of 54.05 while Denolly has played against players with an average rank of 197.64.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lipp has won 20% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Denolly has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lipp has converted 22.22% of breakpoint opportunities, and Denolly has converted 28.79% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Mika Lipp vs Corentin Denolly Best Odds For The Match
Mika Lipp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Tadeas Paroulek
Player
Mika Lipp
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 1-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 2-6 6-3 14-12 | H2H | |||
view more
Corentin Denolly Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Corentin Denolly
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
66%
(
23 of
35)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Blaise Bicknell
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Corentin Denolly
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Corentin Denolly
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Benjamin Willwerth
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Corentin Denolly
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Brandon Holt
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
89)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(7) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Adrian Mannarino
69%
(
89 of
129)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
113)
3
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
39%
(
50 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
113)
119
Total Points Won
123
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
James Kent Trotter
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Corentin Denolly
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Lipp vs Denolly?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Lipp Vs Denolly is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (52/46) | Win/Loss | 63% (412/244) |
| 54% (117/101) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (899/597) |
| 52% (1085/991) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7517/6429) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 52 | Aces Total | 1995 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 122 | Total Double Faults | 1880 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:26:42 |
| 69.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 259.62 |
| 67% (2268/3377) | 1st Serve % | 65% (26358/40557) |
| 59% (1345/2268) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (17769/26358) |
| 48% (531/1109) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (6917/14200) |
| 44% (159/359) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2077/4609) |
| 42% (1402/3334) | Return Points Win % | 43% (17548/41198) |
| 53% (52/98) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (409/647) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (6/12) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (101/179) |
| 41% (9/22) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (114/191) |
| 94% (50/47) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (397/358) |
| 6% (50/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (397/39) |
| 10% (48/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (259/54) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
